Level 5, term 2 field was incredibly interesting, and I thoroughly enjoyed learning about sites spaces and public places. I believe that this topic has benefited me and has shown me a variety of different skills and interesting site-specific and public artists which will be perfect to research into for my future interior design projects. Throughout the weeks I gained new skills and knowledge, particularly with understanding how art in public places is a way to increase the community’s social cohesion as well as their ownership of the space. I have benefited greatly from this field project compared to field in level 4 as the topic relates to my discipline subject massively. One thing which I found really helpful was having tutorials in groups as it enabled me to obtain feedback from not only my project lecturer but also from fellow students who might be able to provide feedback or ideas which I hadn’t thought of before. I have really enjoyed working I have always been interested in how peoples behavioural and emotional responses change depending on the space they are surrounded by and therefore, understanding a variety of mixed opinions about spaces and how they make different people feel has inspired me further within my course subject. One thing which I was interested in was the different ways in which the public can react to the construction/creation of art installations.
My course leader for interior design; Craig Thomas carried out a lecture where he spoke about the impact of Richard Serra’s “tilted arc” sculpture on the public realm. I was incredibly shocked to learn that an intense public debate leads to the removal of the famous steel sculpture. Although the government had asked Serra to produce a piece of artwork for the plaza, they refused to accept that his work provided a positive impact to space and stating that it was ugly and interfered with the social cohesion of the space as it sectioned off the plaza into halves. As a group, we discussed this topic intensely and it sparked a debate as to whether the removal of the “tilted arc” was necessary or not. I believe that the placing of the arc would have attracted more attention to space and therefore, encourage social cohesion to occur more often as people are more likely to share their opinion of the sculpture. Whereas, others in the group suggested that it was an ugly piece of artwork which distracted people from the beauty of the buildings that it was surrounded by. It was interesting working alongside different people from a variety of disciplines and understand their thoughts and feelings where towards different topics.
As an interior design student, I believe that this field topic will help me in the future when designing interiors or installations and how to go about placing artwork within the public realm. A massive part of this topic was the ability for designers to work together when producing artwork in the public realm. Outsourcing was a sub-topic which showed me that by working with a variety of different people with different skills and mindsets helps you to produce a piece of work which is often bigger and better than what you would produce alone. This is because the more people you collaborate with the wider variety of ideas you will obtain, thus, ensuring the production of a diverse, unique and exciting piece of artwork. As part of this project, we had to find a public space and create a piece of artwork which would make a difference to the area. I chose to regenerate an underpass which I use regularly to and from the university and the city centre. The reason I chose to use underpasses as my focal point of this project was that I find them incredibly scary, unsafe and ugly. Therefore, I thought this was the perfect opportunity to redesign a space which is used a lot by the public. Although this project was hypothetical I will continue to peruse this design as I believe it is incredibly important to increase the safety of underpasses and reduce their place lessness.









